Wednesday, July 18, 2018
  The 9/11 Airplane Video Composites  
Abstract

07 - The Key


From: The 9/11 Airplane Video Composites

I bring 22 data sets to test two competing hypotheses:

  • The real airplane hypothesis – A real Boeing 767 airplane flew into WTC2 on 9/11.
  • The video composite hypothesis – The jet crash was faked by inserting airplane images into otherwise authentic video footage.

Each data set is considered under both hypotheses. I explore every explanation that has been offered by supporters of the real airplane. I apply the principles of video compositing, of Newtonian Physics, of logic, and of common sense.

The FOX “Chopper 5” and CNN “Ghostplane” videos are both shown to have multiple observable features irreconcilable with reality, yet perfectly consistent with video compositing. For instance, Chopper 5 is missing an airplane in its first 5 seconds. The airplane that finally does appear has unstable motion. The nose of the airplane image was accidentally allowed to pop out from the back of the tower, and it’s missing a shadow. The wings of CNN Ghostplane pass through the wall of the tower, yet no damage is observed. There’s a puffball that appears in different places in different videos. Each one of these is strictly impossible in reality. Each one of these is a commonplace problem in the world of video compositing.

Having proven compositing on Chopper 5 and Ghostplane, a distinction is made between the compositing techniques employed on live, real-time videos, and those that allow time for editing. By understanding the requirements and limitations of live compositing, I rule out the possibility of any flying object being present. All 9/11 airplane videos are thus proven to be video composites. Each one has had an airplane image inserted into what is otherwise real footage.

3 different videos feature a blackout within ¼ second of one another. Suspicious editing abounds. Broadcast quality videos are unavailable at any price. Chopper 5 was never replayed. Audio has been tampered with. Evident is a very guilty mind on the part of the news networks.

The ultimate conclusion is that the so-called “mainstream media” is a willing propaganda organ of the U.S. government, complicit in mass murder on 9/11.I coin the term “govern-media”.As was the case with the founders of the United States, it is my unalienable right and moral duty to call for the abolishment of the government.

Introduction

Two Hypotheses

At 9:03 a.m. EDT,on September 11, 2001, two different videos of a flying airplane and the exploding World Trade Center towerwere broadcast on live television. These two live video sequences are known as “Chopper 5” and “Chopper 7”. Subsequently, approximately 40 more videos of the same event emerged.At least 4 of these later videos depict an airplane entering the wall of the tower.

Two hypotheses have emerged to explain this:

  • The real airplane hypothesis – A real Boeing 767 airplane flew into the tower.
  • The video composite hypothesis – The jet crash was faked by inserting airplane images into otherwise authentic video footage.

Objective and Methods

Analyze the available videos, consider the principles of video compositing, Newtonian Physics, logic, and common sense to see which hypothesis prevails.

Materials

I call for release of any copy of any live 9/11 airplane video recorded live off of the television at 9:02-9:03 AM, EST, 9/11/01. Especially of interest is FOX Chopper 5. There are only two known copies of this video, and both have been altered.

  • FOX Chopper 5, Salter version. Videographer Kai Simonsen. Apparently recorded off live television, Los Angeles station FOX 11, on VHS tape by person unknown. Footage was allegedly obtained by Jim Hoffman, who gave it to Eric Salter. Digitized by Eric Salter as interlaced Quicktime, 720 × 480. Video has been brightened significantly.
  • FOX Chopper 5, Lawson version.Videographer Kai Simonsen Apparently recorded off live television, New York Station WNYW FOX 5, on VHS tape by person unknown. Footage was digitized by person unknown, as mp4, de-interlaced, with frame blending.
  • ABC Chopper 7. Videographer John Del Giorno. Original source unknown. Digitized by Eric Salter as interlaced Quicktime, 720 × 480.
  • CNN Ghostplane. Allegedly an amateur video shot by Michael Hezarkhani. Interlaced footage ripped from DVD, “CNN – America Remembers”.
  • Gamma Press. Videographer unknown. Footage is Flash Video downloaded from YouTube.
  • Evan Fairbanks. Videographer Evan Fairbanks. Interlaced footage ripped from DVD “In Memoriam – New York City 9/11/01”. Footage appears to have been reduced in quality prior to DVD encoding.
  • Naudet 1st explosion. Videographer Jules Naudet. Original video/film format unknown. Interlaced footage ripped from DVD “ 9/11 – Filmmaker’s Commemorative Edition”.
  • Naudet 2nd explosion. Videographer Jules Naudet. Original video/film format unknown. Interlaced footage ripped from DVD “ 9/11 – Filmmaker’s Commemorative Edition”.
  • Park Foreman. Allegedly an amateur video shot by Park Foreman. Interlaced footage ripped from “CNN –America Remembers”.
  • Control Case for Chopper 5 Wide Shot. Videographer Ace Baker. NTSC DV 720 × 480, horizontal resolution reduced 50% to mimic VHS.
  • Theory of Live 9/11 Airplane Composites. Educational video utilizing Chopper 5 (Salter) and Chopper 7, from above.
  • Theory of Non-Live (Edited) Airplane Composites. Educational video utilizing CNN Ghostplane, from above.
live 9/11 videos

chopper 5
Down the Memory Hole

Slowly Drifting Left

No Plane in the Wide Shot

The Miracle Zoom

Pinocchio’s Nose

Fade to Black

Unstable Motion

The Missing Shadow

the ghostplane
Magically Healing Columns

The Over-Under Puffball

missing in action
No Broadcast-Quality Video

The Naudet Edit

The Ghostplane Edit

The Park Foreman Edit

No Sound in Fairbanks

Hezarkhani Won’t Talk

cartoon physics
Newton Rolls in His Grave

Comparison to Sandia F4 Test

The Force Paradox

No Wake Vortex

Detonation Flashes as Sync Pops

links
contact

Ace Baker's This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Recent changes

Image list

Who is Ace Baker?

Ace Baker Declaration in 9/11 Lawsuits

Since my publicly exposing John Hutchison and the "Hutchison Effect" as mere video fakery, Judy Wood has been silent. Now she has suggested that perhaps the defendants in her 9/11 lawsuit would appreciated my testimony. I highly doubt that. Honest truthseekers love what I have to say, which obviously excludes the defense contractor defendants in Wood's Qui Tam lawsuit.

Here's what I would declare under oath, if ever I got the chance. You can bet this stuff will be in my movie. Copies sent to Judy Wood, Morgan Reynolds, Jim Fetzer, Rosalee Grable (Webfairy), Nico Haupt, Killtown (whoever he turns out to be), Steve Jones, Richard Gage, Stephen Goodale (my executive producer), and Russ Gerst.

It also includes Judy Wood's email stating her current (yet evidently malleable) position on Hutchison Effect, and my previous email that triggered it. 

Dear all,

Please ask yourself why 1-18 are not in evidence in either Reynolds v the world, or Wood v the world, or Steven Jones v the world.

I highly doubt any defendants would be desirous of my testimony in your case, Judy, but if called, by any party, I would testify as follows:

  1. I, Alexander Collin "Ace" Baker am a 47 year old professional musician living in Sherman Oaks, California.
  2. I have expertise in video production, editing, and special effects processing.
  3. I have broad general knowledge of the events of 9/11/01.
  4. I have produced the world's leading scientific analysis of the apparent motion of the airplane image in the WNYW FOX 5 live news broadcast at 9:02-9:03 a.m. September 11, 2001, footage otherwise known as "Chopper 5".
  5. Based on my research, the motion of the airplane image in Chopper 5 becomes more unstable after the video sequence is stabilized.
  6. In authentic airplane videos, the motion of an airplane image must become more stable after the video sequence is stabilized.
  7. Based on my research, a real airplane would be present in the opening 170 video frames of the Chopper 5 video.
  8. There is no airplane visible in the opening 170 frames of the Chopper 5 video.
  9. Based on my research, the nose of the airplane appears to emerge from the back side of WTC2 in the Chopper 5 video.
  10. It is physically impossible for the nose of a real airplane to emerge from the back side of WTC2, or any steel framed hi-rise building. Also, there was no "exit wound" present on the back side of WTC2 where an airplane nose would have come out.
  11. A "layer mask" is a video software tool which allows one area in a video to become transparent, making any video object which enters this "layer mask" area invisible. A false airplane image escaping a layer mask is the only reasonable explanation for the "nose out" observation in the Chopper 5 video.
  12. Based on my research, a video technician faded the picture to black after realizing the the nose of a false airplane image escaped the "layer mask".
  13. The Chopper 5 footage was never replayed, indicating "mens rea" (a guilty mind).
  14. The Chopper 5 footage was replaced on the official government archive with completely different footage, indicating "mens rea" (a guilty mind).
  15. The CNN - Michael Hezarkhani footage shows a plane entering a tower with no damage, to either the plane or the tower.
  16. A later frame in the same video shows a clearly visible hole in the tower.
  17. Therefore, in light of 15 and 16, the tower damage was created at a later point in time than when the airplane image appeared to pass effortlessly through the wall.
  18. Therefore, something besides the airplane image caused the observed damage to WTC2.
  19. I have studied the many videos produced by John Hutchison involving the so-called "Hutchison Effect".
  20. In my opinion, the Hutchison Effect videos are fake. That is, they depict ordinary physical events photographed in such a way as to deceive the viewer in to thinking that something highly unusual is taking place.
  21. Many Hutchison videos depict objects flying upwards. In reality, they are objects falling downwards, photographed upside down.
  22. Many Hutchison videos depict objects wiggling around, and appearing to defy gravity. In reality, they are typically objects photographed upside down, and manipulated via hidden magnets and/or hidden strings.
  23. One Hutchison video depicts a toy UFO moving up and down, and a control string is clearly visible on the upper left side of the screen.
  24. One Hutchison video depicts a toy battleship floating in a tub of water. It appears to move spontaneously, ripples of water appear and disappear spontaneously, and flames appear and disappear spontaneously upon the deck of the toy ship. In my expert opinion, the movement of the ship is caused by a human hand out of view, the flames are caused by the ignition of "flash powder" or similar, the water ripples are caused by a vibrator touching the tub, and that all these explanatory activities have been detectably edited out of the video sequence. Video editing is indicated by the instantaneous changes in flame, water, etc.
  25. Various Hutchison videos depict metal objects changing shape instantly. Given time and temperature, the shape changes are not unusual at all, per se. The instantaneous nature of the changes is most easily explained by video editing.
  26. I have produced several videos reproducing many of the same type of video trickery as John Hutchison. In my opinion, considering my published explanations of how my videos, and also Hutchison's videos were made, this convincingly and permanently dispels the notion of any and all "Hutchison Effect".
  27. In my opinion, based on overwhelming evidence, the events of 9/11 were "an inside job", perpetrated by the U.S. government and the mainstream news media, not Islamic terrorists.
  28. In my opinion, based on publicly available photos and videos, the World Trade Center was demolished with very powerful explosives or weapons of some sort.
  29. I do not know what sort of explosives or weapons were used on 9/11.
  30. In my opinion, the so-called "official story" of 9/11 is not only false, it is physically impossible, and provably so.

Sincerely, 

Ace Baker

[LINK] to original

Read 383 times