Friday, May 24, 2019

Sense and

Significance

What is the sense and significance of life
on Earth, and human life in particular? *

Gurdjieff's question (aka the meaning of life) has a large number of proposed answers from many different cultural and ideological backgrounds, and has produced much philosophical, scientific, and theological speculation throughout history (to no avail).
The Simple answer: Evolving from Unconscious Procreation to Conscious Procreation.


Gurdjieff's lifelong question

Gurdjieff's Lifelong Question



quote small leftWhat is the sense and significance of life on Earth,

Typical answer   

A typical "answer" to this question from: The Online Fourth Way School



     At an early age he awakened to a profound experience of the "whole sensation" of himself, a deep, dimensional self-remembering that became the foundation of his Being. Thus at an early age, Gurdjieff had already realized a high degree of being.

     Experiencing wars and descrution, and the mindless mechanicality of man who he saw as asleep to their self and so living in needless confusion and misery, the question burned in him:

  • quote small leftWhat is the sense and significance of life on Earth and human life in particular?

Feeling "an irrepressible striving" to discover why is there life on earth, what purpose does it serve, if any, Gurdjieff studied orthodox religion and science but found no adequate answer.  He came to intuit that the wisdom societies of ancient civilizations held the key to man's true identity and purpose.

     His search took him to many remote and dangerous places before he finally discovered the "true principles and ideas" of a seminal, ancient teaching in prehistoric Egypt and Abyssinia (present-day Ethiopia). Having discovered the principles and ideas, Gurdjieff realized that over time elements of the teaching had migrated from Egypt northward and he renewed his search.

     This second search led him to Babylon, the Hindu Kush, Siberia and the Gobi desert, where he gathered the dispersed elements of the ancient teaching that was completely unknown up to the present time.

     Gurdjieff then reassembled and reformulated the esoteric teaching of self-transformation he had discovered -- to meet the demands of modern times.  Gurdjieff called this teaching The Fourth Way.

     Humanity, he recognized, was in dire need of this knowledge, for humanity had entered a crucial period in its development. "Unless the wisdom of the East and the energy of the west," he said, "could be harnessed and used harmoniously, the world would be destroyed."  In 1911 Gurdjieff took a vow to awaken people to a new level of being, of consciousness, of conscience; in a word, to a new type of man.

   and human life in particular?quote small right

Having asked that specific question from an early age (probably about the time of his grandmother's death – at age 8), and after acquiring a large expanse of knowledge, wisdom and understanding — why did Gurdjieff NEVER offer a simple answer to that specific question?

quote small leftIf you can’t explain it simply,
    you don’t understand it well enough.
quote small right
      – Famous saying often (mistakenly) attributed to Einstein. [2]

Perhaps Gurdjieff NEVER offered an answer to his lifelong question,
because he did not understand it well enough to explain it simply.

A Simple Question?

Gurdjieff's defenders typically claim that Gurdjieff's question is not a simple question, and claim that Beelzebub's Tales provides Gurdjieff's answer to this non-simple question.

Defender's Reply   

Typical Defense of Gurdjieff's missing answer to his lifelong question


My initial question:  Can you provide any information on the following:

  • Gurdjieff asked the question:
  • "What is the sense and significance of life on Earth, and human life in particular?"
  • Did Gurdjieff ever answer that specific question?
  • Apparently, Gurdjieff asked himself that question at a very early age, but I cannot recall any reference of Gurdjieff giving an answer to that question.
  • Do you have more information about this? The answer he gave?

Defender's reply:  In Bennett's books, Gurdjieff: Making a New World and Is there Life on Earth. Are the closest answers I know. I don't think Gurdjieff was specific about that question.


My reply:  Thanks for the reply, which confirms what I’d thought.

  • Had you ever considered before – that Gurdjieff never answered the question which was formed in him at an early age, and which seemed to be the driving force throughout his life?
  • I’d never though about that fact, before a few days ago. I was a little surprised that it took me 45 years to realize that!
  • Seems like if he had an answer, he would have given it, therefore, I have to conclude that Gurdjieff never figured it out. Oh sure, he had much to say about the “human condition” but never a simple answer to that simple question.

Defender's reply:  I thought a long time about this question.

  • I think G answered that question in All and Everything (Beelzebub's Tales).
  • Almost all of All and Everything is an answer to that question.
  • Please feel free to help me understand the precise essence of your question.

My Reply:  All I’m looking for is a simple answer to a simple question.


Defender's reply:  Hehe, first off, that is NOT a simple question. One could give you a 'simple' answer like "to know, love, and serve God", or some other insipid formatory blather we learned in Catholic school.

  • This question is the grandest, most complicated question a human being could ask.
  • "If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough."
  • I've been asking this question repeatedly, to everyone who is even remotely erudite in spirituality - my entire life. I ask it also to myself everyday. I think it is either a wrong question - like how many angels can fit on a head of a pin; or a question answered to you in Silence by a Natural Knowing - which cannot even begin to be put into words.
  • Sorry I couldn't be much help. But I'd you so find a 'simple' answer. I'd be delighted to know!


Or another reply.

It's in Beelzebub's Tales, if you can get through it.

Here's the Cliff's Notes version:

"Like all organic life on Earth, human beings are apparatuses for transforming energies which are required for some other purpose. However, as a more complicated type of transforming apparatus than plants or animals, human beings possess some choice regarding how to supply the energies required by their existence. They can transform energy consciously or unconsciously, in greater or lesser quantities, and of varying qualities, thereby influencing the purpose and outcome of their deaths."  [LINK]

And so on.

This assumes that:
     ■ Gurdjieff's question is not a simple question.
     ■ A simple answer does not exist.

What if both asumptions are incorrect?
     ■ And it is a simple question.
     ■ With a simple answer.

The Simple Answer

Simple answer:  To evolve from primitive unconscious procreation to civilized conscious procreation.

Primitive Unconscious Procreation:  The same as any animal — any male/female couple procreating instinctively, and without conscious determination. Procreation without being fully informed as to the consequences — to themselves and the child. Unaware of the unconscious forces ensuring survival of life — forces without regard for the child's best interest.

Civilized Conscious Procreation:  Difficult to define because it is unknown. Something along the line of a decision by two fully informed individuals who are able to provide, fully, for the child's life from pre-natal stages of life to the age of personal responsibility; and who also are able to commit to the child's best interest.

PSYOP   

Psychological Operation   [LINK]



Psychological operations (PSYOP) are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals.

Psychological Operation (PSYOP)



mycn18 190
Hourglass Nebula  Image Source

Gurdjieff led a psychological operation — part of a greater psychological operation spanning all of man's existence if not for all of life's existence.
(See: The People of the Secret)

Limited Hangout   

Limited Hangout   [LINK]


A limited hangout, or partial hangout is defined as
a public relations or propaganda technique that involves
the release of previously hidden information in order to
prevent a greater exposure of more important details.

Limited Hangout


The psychological operation Gurdjieff "fronted", was a Partial Disclosure of conscious intervention — from the consciousness which pre-dates the universe — given by the consciousness of the universe.

  • However, the disclosure was cloaked in obscurantism, obfuscation,
  • deception, misdirection and omission — all elements of Gurdjieff's writing style.
Disclosure   

Disclosure (of Conscious Intervention)



For more on the cosmology disclosed by Gurdjieff,
being confirmed by "modern science" see:

This Partial Disclosure (the cosmology "revealed" by Gurdjieff) asserts (among other things):

  • Matter is derived from consciousness (rather than consciousness being a derivitave of matter).[1]
  • Creation passes through multiple levels, known as cosmoi or worlds and finally reaches the level corresponding to Earth.
  • Due to special cosmic circumstance, organic life on Earth is necessary for receiving this energy of creation and transforming this into a form that is passed further along, to 'feed' the 'moon,' which is said to be growing.
  • All this is seen as a natural process where organic Earth life, including man, performs a function in a cosmic organism, a little like bacteria perform a function in the human digestive system.
  • The fact of mankind collectively being required to produce certain 'vibrations' or 'energies' for serving various cosmic purposes is stressed throughout Gurdjieff's Beelzebub's Tales.
  • The food in question is described as vibrations generated by intense human experience, for example the experience of violent death.
  • While being food is inescapable, man may still modulate the quality of his contribution to the cosmic demand of vibrations.
  • With man being less and less conscious, nature found it necessary to substitute quantity for quality of vibrations, thus leading to population explosion and increased incidence of natural catastrophy and war.[2]
  • The evolution of humanity beyond a certain point or, to speak more correctly, above a certain percentage, would be fatal for the moon. The moon at present feeds on organic life, on humanity. Humanity is part of organic life; this means that humanity is food for the moon. If all men were to become too intelligent they would not want to be eaten by the moon. [emphasis in original] [3]

[1] Gurdjieff's Creation Story

[2] Cassiopaea Wiki

[3] Ouspensky, In Search of the Miraculous, p. 64.

Occam's Razor

  • quote small leftAmong competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected.quote small right

Unconscious Procreation assumes there is no difference between human life and the life of any other animal.

  • Continuity of the species takes precedence over the child's best interest.
  • Assumes the method of procreation for animals is also appropriate for humans.
  • Assumes the wishes of the parents are superior to the child's best interest.
  • Unlike other animals, human progeny are neotonic, taking a long time to mature.
  • Gurdjieff's “system” teaches how to repair damaged machines (human beings), but makes no mention of avoiding the unconscious process by which “blank slate” newborns become damaged machines.
  • Life as we know it is based upon Unconscious Procreation. Sex, one of the most powerful forces influencing life (if not the most powerful influence) is integrally connected to Unconscious Procreation.
Conclusion

Extrapolating from the writings of Gurdjieff/Ouspensky it is easy to understand why unconscious procreation and the evolution of procreation was never considered by either (or at least never written about).

  • "The evolution of humanity beyond a certain point or, to speak more correctly, above a certain percentage, would be fatal for the moon. The moon at present feeds on organic life, on humanity. Humanity is part of organic life; this means that humanity is food for the moon. If all men were to become too intelligent they would not want to be eaten by the moon."   In Search, p. 64

Osho wrote about the conditioning of children in his book, the book of children, and claims it to be a fundamental problem facing humanity. In chapter 3, Conditioning, he wrote:

  • "Does a child not have as much right to privacy and freedom from parental conditioning as the parents expect for themselves? It is one of the most fundamental problems facing humanity today. The future depends on how we solve it. It has never been encountered before. For the first time man has come of age, a certain maturity has happened - and as you become mature you have to face new problems.
  • "Slowly, slowly, as man progressed, he became aware of many kinds of slavery. Only recently in the West have we become aware that the greatest slavery is that of the child. It was never thought of before; it is not mentioned in any scripture of the world. Who could have thought … a child and a slave? A slave to his own parents, who love him, who sacrifice themselves for the child? It would have looked ridiculous, utter nonsense!
  • "But now, as psychological insight has deepened into the human mind and its functioning, it has become absolutely clear that the child is the most exploited person; nobody has been exploited more than the child. And of course he is being exploited behind a façade of love.
  • "And I don't say that the parents are aware that they are exploiting the child, that they are imposing a slavery on the child, that they are destroying the child, that they are making him stupid, unintelligent, that their whole effort of conditioning the child as a Hindu, as a Mohammedan, as a Christian, as a Buddhist, is inhuman; they are not aware of it, but that does not make any difference as far as the facts are concerned. The child is being conditioned by the parents in ugly ways, and of course the child is helpless: he depends on the parents. He cannot rebel, he cannot escape, he cannot protect himself. He is absolutely vulnerable; hence he can be easily exploited.
  • "Parental conditioning is the greatest slavery in the world. It has to be completely uprooted, only then will man be able for the first time to be really free, truly free, authentically free, because the child is the father of the man. If the child is brought up in a wrong way then the whole of humanity goes wrong. The child is the seed: if the seed itself is poisoned and corrupted by well-intentioned people, well-wishing people, then there is no hope for a free human individual. Then that dream can never be fulfilled."

Perhaps Gurdjieff privately understood the plight of the child, however the reputed number of children that he fathered (over 100) would seem to discount that possibility.

Read 128 times

Sense and Significance

Gurdjieff's question

Gurdjieff's lifelong question Gurdjieff never gave a simple answer to that simple question! Gurdjieff's defenders typically claim that Gurdjieff's question is not a simple question, and claim that Beelzebub's Tales provides Gurdjieff's answer to this non-simple question. This assumes that:     ■ Gurdjieff's...

Read more

What is Life?

What is Life? One way to define life rigorously is in terms of specific, enumerated traits., which are as follows:     ■ Growth     ■ Feeding and metabolism     ■ Motility (physical movement)     ■ Responsiveness to environmental stimuli     ■ Reproduction with adaptation. Reproduction is probably the most frequently cited"essential" defining characteristic of living systems.     – Robert Freitas, Xenology, chapter 6.2.1

Read more

Transformers and/or Food

Transformers and/or Food Like all organic life on Earth, human beings are apparatuses for transforming energies which are required for some other purpose. However, as a more complicated type of transforming apparatus than plants or animals, human beings possess some choice regarding how to supply the energies required by their existence. They...

Read more

Gurdjieff's Creation Story

Gurdjieff's Creation Story Each organism constitutes a thermodynamic system and its survival depends on keeping one's own entropy lower than that of the environment — each organism feeds on negative entropy and excretes positive entropy. No organism can be beneficial for the environment by its survival. Vegetation on Earth is exceptional because...

Read more

Time and Initiative

Time and Initiative Creation is enacted by a unique alteration in the two prime laws, especially in the law of process. Before creation, they operate on a closed and isolated system. The hermetically sealed design Gurdjieff calls “Autoegocrat”. The redesigned system (“Trogoautoegocrat”) is governed by laws of interdependence, reciprocity, and...

Read more

Unconscious vs. Conscious Procreation

Unconscious vs. Conscious Procreation Unconscious procreation — a noun phrase that is virtually unused in the English language. (see: Google search) It is probably by definition a pleonasm (redundant phase). Why is...

Read more