At the end of 1984, Slavery is Freedom, two plus two equals five, and Winston Smith loves Big Brother. The Party has destroyed Smith’s mind, he embraces whatever narratives it promulgates. The fictive Party has solved the conundrum that bedevils any individual or organization seeking to exercise power: coercion can exact physical compliance and the desired verbalizations, but how do you compel the subjugated to think and believe as you want them to think and believe?

Connecting the Dots to Our Brave New World   By Larry Romanoff

Humankind is at a cusp, a point of transition between two different states of governance and existence. The world today is like a sack being slowly filled while the string around the opening is pulled increasingly tighter to prevent the contents from escaping confinement.

The shadows of this future are everywhere to be seen but even the keenest of observers tend to view the portents not as the warnings they are, but instead regard all these pieces of one despairing puzzle as disconnected and unrelated events. In this essay, we will take a look at where our world is going, how it is going there, and why it is going there.

Did Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey just, sheepishly, issue a 'mea culpa' to all those innocent (mostly conservative) voices he has silenced in the last few years who dared to question the "Russia, Russia, Russia" narrative, the "Biden did nothing wrong" stories, the "Comey is an American hero" facts, and, of course, the "COVID started in a wet market" orgy of lies.

In a tweet, the outspoken provider of safe-spaces, retweeted an essay by Charles Eisenstein entitled "The Conspiracy Myth" which appears to go against everything Twitter has done.

So, we ask in all seriousness, why did Dorsey - who has shown himself, via his actions, to be an enemy of any non-establishment-sanctioned narrative with his suspension and banning of any tweets or twitter-ers that dare to offer alternate views - retweet an essay that raises doubts about the over-arching threat of "conspiracy theories" to snowflakes, promotes the idea of exploring all sides of an argument before dismissing it, and most ironically, rails against "information suppression" and centralized decisions based on someone's "trustworthiness"?

The Governor of Maine has ordered restaurant staff to wear anti-COVID visors upside down so they resemble dog cones in order to direct breath upwards.

Yes, really.

Governor Janet Mills’ decree states that “front-of-house staff in restaurants who choose to wear face shields must now wear them upside down so that they are attached at the collar instead of the forehead, so that their breath is directed up, not down,” reports Maine Public Radio.

Video of the livestream from the Press Conference in Linz, Austria with Steven Whybrow and Claire Edwards, after presenting the President of Austria with the Notice Of Liability in Vienna, the capitol of Austria.

In this presentation Claire Edwards will present and share with us a very speciel document which she calls a GROUNDBREAKING document, with major revelations about what is really going on on our planet right now. Claire Edwards is a former United Nations Staffer in Vienna and Editor and Co-author of the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.

WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON?
Claire Edwards will present a document drawn up by a group of experts that comprehensively explains what is happening on our planet right now and why. It is also a self-help manual for a situation unprecedented in human history. (Full transcript below)

Executive Summary: late last year and this year an extremely dangerous and destructive timeline was initiated that if not derailed will lead to the death of billions either by lethal injection or mass starvation and very possibly both. Only those sufficient to service the needs of those in control will be permitted to survive, and most of these will be herded into heavily surveilled box type living quarters in dense city high rises.

This is not science fiction – those in control have already made it clear that this is their objective, and it will become science fact unless we see a determined commitment to prevent it by a sufficiently large number of people.